The Watch 5 also packed a dual-core processor, the Exynos W920, but it ran at 1.18Ghz. In addition to a bump in CPU specifications, the Watch 6 also gets a slight bump in RAM, coming at 2GB versus LTE (optional), Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi 2.4/5GHz, NFC, GPS/ GLONASS/ GALILEO/ Beidou The Galaxy Watch 6 can pack in more details than So if my husband has the 5 Pro it's not worth upgrading Meanwhile, a Galaxy Watch 5 is worth considering, given the discounted prices you’ll likely find in light of the newer series now available. Galaxy Watch 5 44mm (LTE): $329 / £319 / Rs ⁵As compared to all watches in Galaxy Watch4 series. ⁶Compatibility for Galaxy wearable apps: Android 8.0 or later, 1.5GB of RAM. ⁷Compatible with smartphones running Android 8.0 or later and 1.5GB RAM or more. ⁸Select interchangeable watch bands sold separately. I just disconnected Bluetooth on my GW LTE and let the watch connect remotely to the phone through the LTE network ("Mobile networks" is set to "Auto on/off"). After cleaning the memory from apps in both modes (BT-connected and LTE-connected), Galaxy Wear reported around a 555MB usage, give or take a few MB, in BOTH modes. At $349 (or $399 for LTE, not including carrier fees), the Pixel Watch is competitively priced. It’s about $70 more than the 40mm Galaxy Watch 5, but I’d argue it’s the better choice for I got 42mm classic and thinking to get non classic 44mm. I had bezels on Galaxy watch and liked it. But with wear OS, not liking it. Many of the apps, including some of Samsung's own apps don't respond to bezel turn. Also, I'm starting to think, bezel makes it bit harder to use touchscreen on 42mm (not a problem if your touch area is only the There is one huge advantage of LTE - you can leave your phone at home and still be connected to phone calls, texts and internet data. I originally got it for emergencies when I was out running without my phone but now love the freedom and leave my phone home more and more often. CqZgB.